A little bit of a surprise was the fact that the C919 was designed to carry more passengers in a default all-economy configuration than the Boeing 737-800. It is unclear why they want that extra row (or two), but that little difference might make the C919 more attractive for some airlines. Updated: 06-Sep-2023 @ 15:36z. PMDG has finally released the long-awaited and much-anticipated Boeing 737-800 for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This is the fourth release by PMDG for MSFS, with the DC-6 released last year, the 737-700 in May and the 737-600 in July. Today, the Boeing 737 is one of the most popular aircraft in the skies today and For example, the 737-200 winglets produce little lift. Source: .b737.org.uk. The same goes for 737-800 variants, which use blended winglets which do produce a little lift (redistributing the spanwwise loading). "A Garuda Indonesia Winglets Boeing 737-800 NG" by FathirLeone - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons. The -800 is in the process of getting the new first class seats. New vs. old seats are a big difference. According to Alaska Fleet Status, only 3 of the -800 have completed the retrofit. I do not believe any of the -900/ER have the new seats (but MAX does). For me, which leg depends on the timing. Size comparison between Southwest's 737-800 (left) and 737-700 (right). (Photo by Matt Molnar/NYCAviation) Largest Southwest plane ever: Southwest’s 737-800s are outfitted with 175 seats — nearly 30% more than their 137-seat 737-700s and 737-300s, and about 44% seatier (I just made up that word) than their 737-500s. ci for the 737 and mD-80 fleets for this particular operator. the optimal ci was determined to be 12 for all 737 models, and 22 for the mD-80. the table (see fig. 4) shows the impact on trip time and potential savings over the course of a year of changing the ci for a typical 1,000-mile trip. the potential annual savings to the airline of changing The fuel efficiency between the two is significantly different: Airbus A380 Fuel efficiency per seat - 3.16 L/100 km (74 mpg ‑US) Boeing 737 Fuel efficiency per seat - 2.77 L/100 km (85 mpg ‑US) The above 737 fuel burns are based on a range of 500-1000 nautical miles. I would expect the A380 to lower as the aircraft struggles to take off 37,000 Feet. Maximum Takeoff and Landing Altitude (pressure altitude) 8,400 ft. Turbulent Penetration speeds. 280 knots/.76M, whichever is lower (-800) 280 knots/.73M whichever is lower (-400) Maximum flight operating latitude (-800) 82 degrees north and 82 degrees south except for the region between 80 west and 130 west the maximum flight pDrluJ.